A commitment to something bigger than yourself through abandonment of self-interest.

  • This seems tragically disproportionate to the values of fairness and equity. If engagement happens when self-interest and organisational interests are aligned, a better goal may be to recognise and value shared interests.

  • Interesting one. I think putting what is right and legal ahead of personal gain/ the easy option is important. I'm not sure it is realistic to expect people to abandon their self-interest completely as most people will have an interest in their career, job stability, position in a company, etc. I agree with commitment to the profession but not necessarily the description you provide.

  • I think self interest and organisational interest should align, one should not be at the exception of another. I agree that as an HR professional you need to be able to focus your advise and actions on benefiting both the organisation and its people as opposed to self interest. However I don't think you should abandon self interest all together as your personal ethics and values are important, you should not be made to feel these should be abandoned in the pursuit of something bigger in the organisation. I think maybe it's the wording here that does not work for me rather than the sentiment itself!

  • This is woolly to the point of being either a) meaningless or b) so open to interpretation that it could be used as an excuse for reprehensible behaviour.  

  • A good principle, however this is impossible as a conscious choice. The imperative toward self-interest is genetic and the commitment to an idea or ideal must thus also be instinctive. (Based, somewhat paradoxically, on sub-conscious recognition of a "shared" interest with the ideal being of greater benefit than immediate "self" interest in serving us. In terms of Maslow's Hierarchy: Satisfaction of the "need" for self-realisation through participation in the idealised endeavour overturning the more basic need to survive individually).

  • I don't think humans can "abandon" self interest - there may be times that we are prepared to disadvantage ourselves in the short term for a wider group goal, but arguably this is because we see a longer term advantage to us as a partial consequence

  • I haven't voted for or against anything on the list as I think it's the wrong list. Can I refer you to the CIMA code of ethics

    THIS is the kind of thing we need. Your list if a weird combination of competences and ethics, and I think it uses the wrong language. I think this is a great idea, so please don't abandon it, but let's get it right.

  • I appreciate the sentiment here, but 'abandonment of self-interest' is too extreme - it sounds more like martyrdom than professionalism.  Putting ethical principles above self-interest is fine, but a healthy level of self-interest - valuing oneself appropriately and proportionately and working to achieve personal goals - is compatible with acting professionally.

  • Where on earth did you get the set of values?

    They are made up are they not?

  • I am seated near a HR manager who appears "committed" to the company but whose behaviour is totally contradictory. She asked staff if they had passed their driving test first times and then makes comments loudly if the staff had not. She often keeps the level of office noise high so that it disturbs those sitting around her sufficiently for several hours a day. Whether this is a HR ploy to infer personality judgement tests on staff is clearly debatable. She would also announce the age of certain targeted individual so that others can join in the slaying. I would consider this type of commitment committed to unprofessionalism!

  • It feels like the narrative on this is clumsy but the sentiment accurate.  Being altruistic should (in my view) be part of our 'code' if we work to the letter of our professionalism.    

    I like how CIMA have crafted their code.  Let's learn from others.

  • There should be a work-life balance.

  • We should have a commitment towards our work