Advertisement: open in new window
Latest Posts
‘Hit and run’ driver suspended from job after mocking tweet
By
Claire Churchard
19 hours ago
0
Engagement levels rising in Europe, finds study
By
Michelle Stevens
19 hours ago
0
AGR tells employers ‘break down barriers for disadvantaged grads’
By
Claire Churchard
20 hours ago
0
Cross-border employment contracts should be multilingual
By
Constanze Moorhouse
21 hours ago
0
Managers upbeat despite leadership shortfalls, research reveals
By
PM Editorial
1 day ago
0
Post Categories
Corporate strategy (3580)
Diversity and equality (1752)
Employee Relations (2278)
Employment Law (3347)
Health safety and well-being (139)
HR function (514)
Learning and Development (2382)
Management and business skills (232)
Performance management (277)
Recruitment (1000)
Reward management (738)
Talent Management (1024)
Unassigned (7601)
Join People Management
Tweet
Advertisement: open in new window
Deaf diplomat loses discrimination case
PM Newsdesk
2 Nov 2010
Comments
0
comments
A British diplomat has lost her tribunal case against the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) after it withdrew an overseas job offer because of the cost of accommodating her deafness.
FCO employee Jane Cordell lodged the discrimination claim when Whitehall revoked its decision to offer her a role as Britain’s deputy ambassador to Kazakhstan, after it emerged the cost of providing trained “lip speakers” would be £240,000.
The employment tribunal upheld the FCO’s decision on the grounds of cost, reported
The Independent
, after it heard that the bill to the public of employing the speech interpreters would amount to five times Cordell’s salary.
The ruling says the cost of providing the legally required adjustments for Cordell’s posting was “simply unreasonable”, and supports the decision the FCO made to withdraw the job offer in January.
However, the tribunal is said to concede that this places “some limitations” on the types of posting that Cordell could expect to be offered in future.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said the ruling raised concerns about the growing barriers to disabled people in the workplace and their likelihood of proceeding as far as able-bodied people in their chosen careers.
A spokesperson for the EHRC, which part-funded Cordell’s case, described the outcome as “disappointing”, adding: “It is important that reasonable adjustments are provided to allow disabled people like Jane to realise their full potential.”
Tweet
Add Comment
Your comment has been posted.
Close
Thanks for your comment. All comments are moderated and if approved it will appear soon.
Close
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you sign in, you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features such as a weekly newsletter, access to the community and special interest forums, a personalised website, and their own profile section.
To save your details,
Login
or
Register
Username
Email
Comment
I have read and accepted the
terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately.
Post
Comment List
Related Content
Cordell v Foreign and Commonwealth Office
over 1 year ago
0
Croad v UCU
11 months ago
0
Read the prize draw small print
over 7 years ago
0
The Environment Agency v Rowan
over 5 years ago
0
Get your act together
over 12 years ago
0
View More