• Doctors in industrial action ballot over pensions

  •  
  • 27 Feb 2012
  • Comments 5 comments
The British Medical Association is to ballot doctors for industrial action for the first time in almost 40 years, in protest at the government’s reforms to public-sector pensions.

The union has ruled out strikes to ensure that patient care is not endangered, but will be asking its members whether they support action short of a strike.

The BMA said that the vote was a “last resort” after the government had failed to return to meaningful talks on NHS pensions.

The association added that 84 per cent of the 46,000 doctors and medical students it surveyed in January wanted to reject the government’s offer.

Chairman of the BMA Council, Dr Hamish Meldrum, said that the government was intending to renege on a deal struck four years ago, which had reformed the NHS pensions scheme to make it “fair, affordable and sustainable.”

The 2008 agreement gave doctors a retirement age of 65, while those under the previous 1995 scheme can retire at 60.

New government proposals will see an immediate increase in personal pension contributions, the retirement age rise to 68 and the end of the final salary scheme for hospital doctors. GPs already have a career average scheme.

“The decision to ballot for the first time in 40 years has not been taken lightly,” said Meldrum. “Doctors and medical students have overwhelmingly rejected the current offer, and we’ve pursued every avenue we possibly could to bring the government back to meaningful talks. With no signs of movement, we simply cannot ignore this strength of feeling by medical staff. We therefore have no other option but to ballot on industrial action.”

Meldrum warned that “a big tranche of experienced doctors” were likely take early retirement and leave the NHS if the pension changes were implemented, and that it would also be damaging to medical students who already faced a massive hike in tuition fees.

Responding to the BMA’s move, NHS Employers said that patient care would be the “first priority” in the event of industrial action, but urged doctors to wait until the government had “released full, final details” of the pension proposals before voting in ballots.

“I understand the anxiety of staff about changes to pensions,” said Dean Royles, director of the NHS Employers.

“But this announcement will be disconcerting for patients and disappointing to the majority staff who recognise the importance of the essential services they provide and the impact industrial action will have on patient care.

“It is vital that they make fully-informed decisions and we ask that all parties concentrate on helping staff understand the changes.”

The last time BMA members took industrial action was in 1975, when doctors adopted ‘work-to-rule’ over a contractual dispute.

Last week, the BMA was also one of the health associations excluded from a Downing Street summit on the controversial Health and Social Care Bill, which the union opposes.
Add Comment






  • I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
    These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately.

  • Post
Comment List
Comments (5)
  • There are a number of misconceptions that a couple of the above posters seem to have. The government say that 'we are all in it together' and yet doctors pension contributions are rising to up to 14.5% - this is far in excess of other NHS professionals, and if you consider that civil servants are fed up that their contributions are rising from 2% to 3%. So doctors seem to be more 'in it' than everyone else. Also consider that the NHS pension scheme is already BILLIONS in surplus - this rise in contributions isn't going into the scheme, but rather straight to the Treasury. So in actual fact it's income tax. <br/>Comments about our professionalism are ignorant - there is no strike, but rather a ballot on whether to withdraw all the things we do in our free time. My peers at school and university earn 4-5 times as much as me...the payback was always the pension scheme. We have no problem with paying more than others, but targeting doctors when bankers are STILL getting multi million pound bonuses is an insult.

  • The pension IS good in the NHS, and this is perhaps one of the only incentives attracting fresh talent to this vital service. Without this talent the NHS will not last long at all thanks to a huge proportion of its workforce approaching retirement! But it is not money for nothing. It is part of a reward package that makes up for what public sector workers DO NOT get that some private sector workers take for granted: huge cash bonuses, company cars, profit share schemes, free lunches, office parties with free flowing beer... need I go on?

  • This is a subject very close to my heart and I also have worked for the NHS, I think the people of this country forget about all the hard work, endless hours Doctors and Nurses do for the people of this country and they<br/>deserve more than the bankers more than private<br/>enterprise because they save our lives when we are not well and in need they deserve their pensions, what ever the cost.

  • Having been employed in the NHS This is typical of the BMA and medics, the government/any party cannot afford these pension schemes, the Tax payer can not afford them. They don't care, only lookout for them selfs. Panic the public about the service,  if the changes come in it will not effect the current employed Doctors or the excellent quality of the NHS service to patients<br/>Even then the scheme will be best in uk, better than private section

  • I was under the assumption that Dr's were professionals? I come from one of the other 'main' professions & industrial action never comes into question. The deal they get from the NHS pension post change is exceptional! They need to get real & understand that the country is in a mess. If interest rates moved upwards the UK economy could mimic Spain/Italy rapidly.