• Royles sounds warning ahead of doctors’ pension meeting

  •  
  • 28 Jun 2012
  • Comments 3 comments
The director of NHS Employers, Dean Royles, has urged doctors to avoid further industrial action for the sake of their patients.

As the BMA Council prepared for a meeting today to discuss the ongoing pensions dispute, Royles said that council needs to put patients “at the centre of any decision making” when they decide their next course of action.

Earlier this month thousands of doctors took action in protest against government pension reforms, which include moving from final salary pensions to an alternative a new career average scheme.

Although the 21st June protest was not a strike in the sense of being a full withdrawal of labour, doctors did not take on any work that could be safely deferred.

"The doctors' strike has pulled NHS patients into a dispute not of their making and no one wants to see that happen again,” said Royles. “Industrial action is not fair on patients and, whatever anyone says, it carries risks to them.

"Thankfully, planning by employers - with the help of doctors - kept urgent and emergency services open. But people need to understand that even the most robust planning can never guarantee patients' safety. Thousands of people were inconvenienced and distressed.

"Whatever the rights and wrongs of the dispute, patients are definitely not to blame. I hope that the BMA Council will reflect carefully and it will be at least another 40 years before the NHS sees further industrial action."

Royles also praised the “good relationships” between employers and unions in the NHS and said that both groups needed to work together to achieve the challenging and complex implementation of the public sector pension reforms.

Under the pension changes, doctors will have to work longer - until 68 rather than 65 – while employee contributions will increase to as much as 14.5 per cent of salary for the highest paid individuals.
Add Comment






  • I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
    These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately.

  • Post
Comment List
Comments (3)
  • Lesley 1st July<br/><br/>I would like to say that I am tired of the comparisons made between the Public and Private sectors they are not a like.  If I meet all my targets and objectives I don't get a pay rise, When I work long hours I don't get overtime as there is no budget for this.  In relation to pensions whilst I don't want the Dr's to go on strike what else can they do.  When you join a pension fund you along with your pension provider agree terms and conditions you pay x and they provide y.  Why do we are a group of people now accept that part way through a contract it is ok to change the terms of that contract so now we pay x + and you won't get y.  Fine if as a group you want to negotiate for new entrants to the scheme enterng on new terms and conditions but please stop accepting that changes to your pension fund part way through a contract is fine because it isn't.

  • Have your say...<br/>I do not think taking industrial action will serve the course that they wish to achieve.  Prison staff are not allowed to strike and I believe that Doctors should be bound by the same rules.  Doctors, since the Age of the Enlightnment have been put on a pedestal and believe that the value they give to society is higher than anyone else and I would like to challenge that.

  • Have your say...<br/><br/>I appeciate that workers in the public sector get do work long hours and the pension is a perk. However whilst I understand this it is not sustainable in the long term. Private sector scrapped final salary payments and this is funded by the goverment and the tax payer. <br/>People are living longer and this isi a key fact. One that is overlooked. Public sector checkbook is not able to cover all these costs.