Beecroft proposals for compensated no-fault dismissals are objectionable and unnecessary, warns CIPD in response to Government consultation
As the window for responding to the Government’s consultation on no-fault dismissals closes today, the CIPD is urging ministers to recognise that watering down employment regulation is not only damaging for employee relations but will also fail to achieve the intended result.
Mike Emmott, employee relations adviser at CIPD, comments: “We know that employers don’t spend all their time worrying about unfair dismissal claims. In fact, according to the Government’s own research, unfair dismissal doesn’t even figure in the list of top ten regulations discouraging them from recruiting staff.
“Adrian Beecroft’s proposal for a system of compensated no-fault dismissal is objectionable and unnecessary. It is objectionable because it would be a licence for bad practice in managing people and damage the reputation of the whole micro-business sector. It is unnecessary because employers facing a possible tribunal claim can already offer the employee a compromise agreement, and tailor the level of compensation to the particular circumstances.
“Countries that have excluded small businesses from unfair dismissal regulations such as Germany, Australia and Spain have generally found it has failed to achieve the intended result. There is no evidence that no-fault dismissal would make a positive contribution to economic growth in the UK by encouraging the smallest firms to recruit more employees. Indeed, by increasing job insecurity and reducing employee engagement it would be more likely to damage growth.”
Read the CIPD’s full consultation response
If you wish to reproduce this press release in full on your website, please link back to the original source