register / login
The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
 
 
 
Go to
Sitemap    
Subjects   
Search for
 
 
 
 

Transfer of undertakings (TUPE)

Revised April 2009


This factsheet gives introductory guidance. It:

  • gives a brief history and basic legal principles behind the TUPE regulations
  • summarises the major changes of the TUPE regulations
  • looks at when the TUPE regulations apply and the impact of breaching them
  • outlines the obligations of the transferee concerning a transfer
  • offers some practical suggestions.

Overview


The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246)1 (referred to below as TUPE 2006) is the main piece of legislation governing the transfer of an undertaking, or part of one, to another. The regulations are designed to protect the rights of employees in a transfer situation enabling them to enjoy the same terms and conditions, with continuity of employment, as formerly. TUPE 2006 entirely replaces the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 (SI 1981/1794) which have often been referred to as the TUPE regulations.

TUPE regulations were introduced to comply with relevant EC Directives concerning transfers of undertakings. The main Directives are:

  • the Acquired Rights Directive (77/187/EC)
  • the Acquired Rights Directive (98/50/EC)
  • the Acquired Rights Amendment Directive (2001/23/EC).

In incorporating the original Acquired Rights Directive into UK law there have been various amendments to the UK regulations and a great deal of case law.

In addition to the points set out below the regulations are currently also designed to ensure:

  • more comprehensive application of the regulations to service provision situations where services are outsourced, 'insourced' or assigned to a new contractor to achieve greater certainty that TUPE applies to labour-intensive services such as office cleaning, catering, security, and refuse collection;
  • the transferee is aware of the employees’ rights, obligations and liabilities upon transfer;
  • clarification of the circumstances when the ETO defence (see below) can be applied to change the terms and conditions of employment and in which employers can lawfully make transfer-related dismissals;
  • that transfers of insolvent businesses are more viable by introducing greater flexibility to attract potential buyers;
  • the transferor and transferee jointly and severally liable for any failure to inform and consult with the transferring employees;
  • the territorial application of TUPE is extended so that overseas employees may also be caught by the transfer.

The further statutes and regulations which have an effect on TUPE are: 

  • The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2587)
  • The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/1925)
  • Pensions Act 2004, especially sections 257 and 258
  • The Transfer of Employment (Pensions Protection) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/649).

The Department of Trade and Industry (now BERR) published revised guidance in 20072 for employers, employees and their representatives on TUPE 2006.

What is a relevant transfer of an undertaking?


TUPE will apply to what are known as ‘relevant transfers’ which may occur in a wide range of situations. The two broad categories are business transfers and service provisions changes. Some transfers will be both a business transfer and a service provision change.

Business transfers


The question here is whether there is a transfer of an economic entity that retains its identity. This can be broken into two parts:

  • Is there a ‘stable economic entity’ that is capable of being transferred?
  • Will the economic entity retain its identity after the transfer in question?

To decide if there is a stable economic entity that is capable of being transferred, the factors to consider include:

  • Is the type of business being conducted by the transferee (incoming business) the same as the transferor's (outgoing business)?
  • Has there been a transfer of tangible assets such as building and moveable property (although this is not essential)?
  • What is the value of the intangible assets at the time of the transfer?
  • Have the majority of employees been taken over by the new employer?
  • Have the customers been transferred?
  • What is the degree of similarity of the activities carried on before and after?

If the answer to all (or in some cases several of) the above questions is 'yes', it is safe to assume that there has been a transfer of a stable economic entity. The absence of a profit-motive is not a determinative factor.

Service provision changes


A 'service provision change' occurs when a client who engages a contractor to do work on its behalf is either:

  • reassigning such a contract (whether by contracting out, outsourcing or re-tendering), or
  • bringing the work ‘in-house’ (where a contract ends with the service being performed in-house by the client themselves)

It will not be a service provision change if:

  • the contract is wholly or mainly for the supply of goods for the client’s use, or
  • the activities are carried out in connection with a single specific event or a task of short-term duration.

In what situations does TUPE apply?

 
By way of broad guidance TUPE has been found to apply to:

  • mergers
  • sales of a businesses by sale of assets
  • a change of licensee or franchisee
  • the gift of a business through the execution of a will
  • contracting out of services
  • changing contractors
  • where all or part of a sole trader's business or partnership is sold or otherwise transferred.

However, TUPE does not apply to:

  • transfers by share take-over
  • transfers of assets only (for example, the sale of equipment alone would not be covered, but the sale of a going concern including equipment would be covered
  • transfers of a contract to provide goods or services where this does not involve the transfer of a business or part of a business
  • the supply of goods for the client's use, for example, supplying food to a client to sell in its staff canteen, rather than a situation where the contractor runs the canteen for the client.
  • transfers of undertakings situated outside the United Kingdom (although these may be covered by the regulations of other member states).

The law on relevant transfers in the case of contracting out and changes of contractors for labour intensive activities, such as security, catering,refuse collection and cleaning, has given rise to confusion in the past. Many of these difficulties have been resolved by TUPE 2006. However TUPE 2006 will apply in many situations where an organisation such as an advertising agency or a law firm takes over a client from another firm following a tender process. The new firm may be under an obligation to also take on the staff who were working on the client account for the previous firm. Case law on this issue is starting to emerge.

CIPD members can find out much more on these case law developments from our Transfer of Undertakings (TUPE) FAQs in the Employment Law at Work area of our website.

Impact of a breach of the TUPE regulations


If a TUPE transfer applies, all terms and conditions of work and continuity of employment should be preserved. This principle applies to all employees who were employed in the entity transferred immediately before the transfer; and those who would have been so employed if they had not been unfairly dismissed for a reason connected with the transfer.

Subject to a one year qualifying period, such a dismissal will be automatically unfair for a reason connected with the transfer unless it is for an 'economic, technical or organisational' (ETO) reason (see below).

The table below sets out three different categories of dismissal and whether they are fair or unfair.

Type of dismissal Fair or unfair
Dismissals for which the sole or principal reason is the transfer itself,or a reason connected with the transfer that is not for an ETO reason. Automatically unfair under the unfair dismissal legislation.
Dismissals for which the sole or principal reason is not the transfer itself, but is a reason connected with the transfer that is for an ETO reason. Potentially fair subject to the normal test of reasonableness under the unfair dismissal legislation.
Dismissals for which the sole or principal reason is entirely unconnected with the transfer. These fall outside TUPE as they are unrelated to a relevant transfer and the usual unfair dismissal principles will apply. This is the case even though the dismissals may be made around the time of such a transfer.

Information

From 6 April 2006, transferors became obliged to give the transferee written information about the employees who are to transfer and all the associated rights and obligations towards them. This information includes, for example, the identity and age of the employees who will transfer, information contained in the employees’ written particulars of employment under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and details of any claims that the transferor reasonably believes might be brought.

If the transferor does not provide this information, the transferee may apply to an employment tribunal for such amount as it considers just and equitable. Compensation starts at a minimum of £500 for each employee in respect of whom the information was not provided or was defective.

Consultation and notification

 
The transferor has a responsibility to conduct a full and meaningful consultation with employees at the earliest practicable time. Failure to conduct consultation results in liability for the payment of compensation which may be up to 13 weeks' pay. The transferor and transferee are both liable for any award of compensation made by an employment tribunal for failure to inform and consult.

Liability passing on to the incoming contractor

 
The transferee takes over the liability for all statutory rights, claims and liabilities arising from the contract of employment, for example, liabilities in tort, unfair dismissal, equal pay and discrimination claims. The exception to this rule applies to criminal liabilities.

Pensions


Strictly speaking, obligations relating to provisions about benefits for old age, invalidity or survivors in employees' occupational pension schemes do not transfer under TUPE. However, the provisions of the Pensions Act 2004 sections 257 and 258 do apply to transfers taking place after 6 April 2005. In effect, this means that provisions equivalent to the TUPE regulations apply to pension rights from that date. In essence, if the previous employer provided a pension scheme then the new employer has to provide some form of pension arrangement for employees who were eligible for, or members of the old employer's scheme. It will not have to be the same as the arrangement provided by the previous employer but will have to be of a certain minimum standard specified under the Pensions Act.

Are there any ‘defences’ to prevent the TUPE regulations applying?


The economic, technical or organisational (ETO) reason relating to the entity which is being transferred is one of the few legitimate factors for the basis of a refusal to take on the transferor's workforce by the prospective transferee. The reason has to be the main cause of the dismissal, thus making the dismissal justifiable provided an employment tribunal decides that the employer acted reasonably in all circumstances. If it can be shown that the economic reasons were a 'sham' and that the workforce were not taken on in order to avoid the application of the TUPE regulations, then the transferee could be liable for potential claims.

Employees with less than one year's service cannot usually present claims under TUPE as employment protection rights have not been accrued.

Practical suggestions


TUPE is a complex area so it is essential to seek legal advice for individual circumstances. Where a business, or part of one, is being transferred, both parties (ie the transferor and the transferee) should seek such advice at the earliest possible stage. It may be possible for a legal representative to negotiate an indemnity which will provide a partial, or total, cushion against the financial impact of any claims resulting from the application of TUPE.

CIPD members can find out much more from our Transfer of Undertakings (TUPE) FAQs in the Employment Law at Work area of our website.

Useful contacts

References

  1. The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. (2006) SI 2006/246. London: HMSO. Available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si200602.htm 
  2. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY. (2007) Employment rights on the transfer of an undertaking: a guide to the 2006 TUPE Regulations for employees, employers and representatives. London: DTI. Available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file20761.pdf

Further reading


CIPD members can use our Advanced Search to find additional library resources on this topic. They can also use our online journals collection to view selected journal articles online. People Management articles are available to subscribers and CIPD members on the People Management website. CIPD books in print can be ordered from our online Bookstore. 

Books and reports


INCOMES DATA SERVICES. (2007) Transfer of undertakings. Employment law handbooks. London: IDS. 

Journal articles
 

BRETTLE, O. (2007) The EU Acquired Rights Directive and its impact on business transfers. Benefits and Compensation International. Vol 37, No 4, November. pp7-8,10,12-13.

COLE, K. (2008) Is TUPE a safety net or a tricky act to follow? People Management. Vol 14, No 1, 10 January. p20.

MCMULLEN, J. (2007) Don't be caught out by TUPE agency rules. People Management. Vol 13, No 22, 1 November. p21.

MCMULLEN, J. (2008) Stay the right side of cross-border rules. People Management. Vol 14, No 2, 24 January. p24.


This factsheet was updated by Lisa Ayling, solicitor and employment law consultant.

 
 
 
 
Bookmark and share