This guide will help you plan your organisation’s next steps following a period of furlough or once lockdown measures start easing
Q: From a health, safety and well-being perspective, what are the employer's obligations about managing a return to work?
Government guidance issued on Monday 11 May confirmed that:
- For the foreseeable future, workers should continue to work from home wherever possible.
- All workers who cannot work from home should travel to work if their workplace is open. Sectors of the economy that are allowed to be open should be open; this includes food production, construction, manufacturing, logistics, distribution and scientific research in laboratories. The only exceptions to this are those workplaces such as hospitality and non- essential retail which the Government is currently requiring to remain closed.
The Prime Minister advised every workplace should be Covid-19 secure and new guidelines are now available to help employers ensure workplaces are as safe as possible. Whilst employers should take account of the ongoing guidance from the UK government, employers should also consider the general law, for example by assessing the risks to employees, clients and customers.
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are giving different advice about staying at home for longer. Scotland and Wales have written social distancing requirements into law, for example employers have legal duty to maintain two metres between workers wherever possible. In England similar requirements are in guidance from the Government and Public Health England (PHE).
It is sensible if employers consult with their employees about any return to work and the proposed new infection control arrangements; good communication is essential. Employers should discuss return-to-work issues with individual employees before any physical return to office as part of a sensitive and supportive conversation with their line manager. This should be part of a broader re-induction process that takes on board any adjustments or ongoing support that people may need following lockdown. Employee engagement will help identify support and ensure teams feel more confident about returning. Where relevant employers should also seek union input for any return to work measures.
Employers should undertake risk assessments which will need to be reviewed as government advice changes. You may wish to refer to the Health and Safety Executive website for more information. A risk assessment has a crucial role in ensuring a safe return to the workplace process. The end goal is to adopt appropriate control measures which reduce or remove the risks of contracting Covid-19 when returning to work. The risks around visitors entering the workplace, such as customers should be assessed too as there is also a legal obligation to ensure their health and safety.
Health and safety duties
Employers have a contractual duty to take care of employees’ health and safety and other statutory duties too including:
- Implied duty to protect the health and safety, of all employees.
- Duty to look after the mental health, as well as physical health, of employees.
- Duty to protect members of the public, clients, customers and contractors.
- Duty to manage the health and safety risks from the workplace itself including equipment such as hand driers and air conditioning systems which may circulate viruses although there has been little research on this. Other workplace issues include cleanliness and washing facilities.
- Provision of safe systems of work possibly including provision of PPE subject to availability.
- Information and training (including reminding employees of their responsibilities in meeting health and safety requirements).
Employers’ health and safety duties extend to mental health and well-being as well as physical infection control measures. Risk assessments should cover managing mental health and well-being aspects too. You may wish to refer to the Health and Safety Executive stress risk assessment tools.
Employees with new working arrangements in the workplace and working from home can suffer from stress or mental health issue maintain contact and look for signs of problems. Employees who have been furloughed should be included.
As well as implementing or reviewing policies and procedures and proactively monitoring and keeping in contact with staff, employers should point them to other support that is available. Managers may need fresh training in recognising the symptoms of poor mental health so they can signpost to early intervention and expert support such as occupational health, an employee assistance helpline.
If an employer becomes aware that particular employees are struggling with their mental health, they should conduct individual risk assessments for both home and workplace workers.
Employers have the same health and safety responsibilities towards those working from home as for any other workers, including physical mental health see the guidance on protecting home workers.
Q: What steps should employers take before employees return to work?
On 10 May 2020, the Government started to outline plans to enable certain sectors in England to return to work. Employees who can operate from home are advised to continue to do so, meanwhile official guidance on returning to the workplace continues to emerge. The devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are maintaining a longer period of lockdown.
Employers should attempt to reduce risk for employees being exposed to coronavirus, keep their options open and have the capability to adapt plans as the situation and advice evolves. A number of key considerations that employers must check before asking employees to return to work are set out below.
Comply with current government guidance
Employers should check the current government advice on returning to work including the Working safely during coronavirus guidance for specific sectors. Employers must make attempts to implement this guidance, otherwise employees may be entitled to refuse to return. The available guides cover workplaces that are permitted to be open including some shops, construction and other outdoor working environments. Other guidance covers factories, warehouses, labs and research facilities, offices and similar indoor environments. There is also guidance for those working in or delivering to other people's homes and for restaurants offering takeaway or delivery services. Further guidance in the set covers couriers, mobile workers, lorry drivers etc. Public transport, educational and childcare guidance, as well as the current position on schools reopening, is also available- see our Returning to the workplace FAQs on school re-openings.
Undertake a thorough risk coronavirus specific risk assessment
Even though some government announcements have given relatively short notice of potential returns to work, employers should keep risk assessments under review anyway. Employers should keep evidence that safety measures were implemented and complied with. They should also consider who they are asking to come into work and if it’s safe to so. This will entail considering the government’s specific guidance to employers covering measures such as increased workplace cleaning, changing office layouts, keeping a two-metre distance at work, supplying safety equipment etc. Employers who have complied with their duty of care, conducted thorough risk assessments and implemented safety measures, will be in a stronger position to ask employees to return to workplace.
Review written health and safety policy
Employers should have a written policy on health and safety if they have more than five employees. For those with fewer than five employees, there should still be a health and safety policy, although it doesn’t have to be written down. The arrangements section in the policy should say how the employer will meet its commitments, including elimination or reduction of the risks and hazards in the workplace.
Take steps to comply with health and safety obligations
Employers have a duty to protect the health and safety of employees, and under the Employment Rights Act (s.44), employees are further protected if they refuse to return to work because they reasonably believed there was a serious and imminent danger to themselves or others. Coronavirus classifies as a danger and is a potential reason not to return to work. Employers will need to keep evidence to show they attempted appropriate measures to provide a safe working environment. Employees could insist on staying at home, refuse to return to the workplace or could choose not to do certain tasks if they feel employers have not taken appropriate measures to provide a safe environment.
Provide training and communicate with employees about the necessary steps
Under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, employers must provide appropriate information, instruction, training and supervision to ensure the health and safety of employees. Further legislation requires training following exposure to new or increased risks, which includes coronavirus, and consultation with employees or their representatives on issues relating to health and safety.
Take reasonable steps
Remember the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) will be doing spot checks and issuing sanctions to ensure that workplaces are safe, and that employers have taken reasonable action.
Employers may wish to check their employer's liability, management liability or directors and officers (D&O) insurance cover as well.
If employers fail in their responsibility to provide a safe working environment and there is a genuine health and safety risk from being required to attend work, this can amount to a breach of the duty of care and of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. This links to potential constructive unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims. If employees contract coronavirus as a result of inadequate steps being taken there could also potentially be personal injury claim against the employer.
For further advice see our see our COVID-19: returning to the workplace guide.
Q: How do we respond to an employee who is needed at work but has childcare issues despite their child’s school being open
This situation could arise because:
- The school is open but the employee doesn’t feel comfortable sending their child in.
- Their child’s school hours are limited.
- The employee can’t send their child back because they are shielding a vulnerable adult at home.
In all three of the different scenarios dealt with below, employers should listen to, and attempt to address, the employee’s concerns. Alternative options to consider include whether the employee can be redeployed to a homeworking role, or put on furlough leave, unpaid leave or unpaid parental leave. Other options include annual leave and statutory time off for dependants. Flexible working, part-time working, adjustments to hours and duties and so on, may also be relevant. All these alternatives would need to be agreed. Some employers are reducing the numbers of staff in the office at any one time. Any agreed changes are likely to be temporary as school attendance is likely to become compulsory again from September onwards.
The school is open, but the employee doesn’t feel comfortable sending their child in
Some employees may refuse to return to work once schools re-open if they feel schools (or their workplace) are unsafe. Employers cannot insist that employees send their children back to school. Schools are re-opening for some year groups but it is not the employer’s decision whether employees’ children attend school. Attendance for this year’s summer term is not compulsory anyway.
Employers may be able to require the employee to come into the workplace if it is safe, in which case the employee will have to try and make alternative childcare arrangements.
The employer should listen to the employee’s concerns and consider employees’ proposals about working and accommodate them as far as practicable. Options to consider include continued working from home as current government guidance is that employers should still encourage all employees who can work from home to do so wherever possible. If employees have younger children which makes working from home difficult, employees may be able to do work at other times of the day, or work when a partner (if any) is available to share childcare. Other options include those set out above.
Advice on self-isolation and social distancing, especially for grandparents with clinically vulnerable conditions, make it more difficult for employees to make alternative arrangements for the care of their children, although other members of the same household may be able to assist, or childminders could be used.
For further discussion on employees’ entitlement to paid time off during school closures, see our Managing remote working and business closures FAQs.
The child’s school hours are limitedAs explained in our question on school re-openings referred to above, only certain year groups are returning to school for this year’s summer term. Because of the need to keep class sizes down to 15 in primary school, and to restrict the year groups to 25% in secondary schools, normal school hours may be reduced.
Employers can attempt to discuss matters with employees and reach an agreed temporary solution (until September). This could consist of the options referred to above, including continued working from home, if possible, or adjusted working hours, or perhaps adjusted tasks that can be undertaken at home.
If none of these options are feasible, the employee will have to try and make alternative childcare arrangements.
The employee cannot send their child back because they are shielding a vulnerable adult
If employees are concerned about sending their children back to school because they are shielding a vulnerable adult at home, then the employee may decide to keep the child at home for the summertime. Depending on the nature of the vulnerability, and the age of the child, the person being shielded may be able to provide childcare.
Otherwise the employer may need to consider alternative options including working from home, furlough leave or possibly statutory sick pay.
If an employee lives with a shielded person there is a risk of an associated discrimination claim if employers require those employees to return to work without taking the vulnerability of the shielded person into account. Associative discrimination claims may be attempted if an employee is treated less favourably due to the disability of their shielded household member. An employee can claim associative discrimination if they refuse to attend work because someone in their household is shielding. Normally this relates to workplace risks, but the claim could also be attempted because of childcare issues linked to the shielding person.
Risks of disciplining and dismissal
Before the pandemic, an employee refusing to attend work would lead to disciplinary procedures and ultimately dismissal. This remains a final option, but there are many risks in doing so, and alternative solutions should be exhausted first. If all other options fail, in all employment contracts there is an implied term that employees must follow their employer’s lawful and reasonable instructions. Employees can potentially be disciplined as a last resort if a continued long-term refusal to attend work is unreasonable. Realistically schools should reopen by September and if employees still refuse to come into work then, this is likely to be unreasonable.
There is a risk that disciplining employees for refusal to work due to childcare issues will result in a sex discrimination claim. Some employees with mental health issues may be especially anxious about their children or travelling on public transport or returning to work themselves. If an employee’s mental condition constitutes a disability the employer should take extra care in attempting to accommodate their request. Compensation for employees who are found by to have been discriminated against is uncapped.
Employers should also remember that as well as concerns about their children, employees may have concerns about the safety of the workplace (see What if our people can't come back - or don't want to travel on public transport?). If employees’ concerns relate to returning to the workplace rather than childcare, then they can claim to have suffered a detriment on health and safety grounds, or claim automatically unfair dismissal if the employee reasonably believes there was a serious and imminent danger which led to their refusal to return to work. Whistleblowing claims may also be attempted.
For further information on the balancing act concerning employees returning to work, see What is the legal and moral position on encouraging vs mandating return?
Q: What do employers need to know about the reopening of schools?
Employers may be faced with employees stating they cannot return to the workplace due to childcare issues. Both employers and employees should fully understand local authority and government advice concerning returning to work and the reopening of schools. Employers should also undertake risk assessments and take the health and safety steps summarised in our question From a health, safety and well-being perspective, what are the employer's obligations about managing a return to work?
Is school compulsory?
It is not compulsory for parents to send their children to school if they fall within the relevant year groups undergoing staged reopening. It is, therefore, difficult for employers to insist on school attendance that is not compulsory anyway. Government guidance and announcements only state children in the relevant year groups are expected or strongly encouraged to return. Financial penalties for parents who don’t send eligible children back are suspended. This temporary suspension of usual sanctions will continue for parents of the relevant year groups for at least the summer term.
Key workers have had access to sending their children to school throughout the crisis, but this has been optional for them. There have been no fines for those who have not taken up the places available. The government is, however, urging teachers and local authorities to encourage all children classed as vulnerable to return to school.
School plans by year group
Employers should be aware that not all employees can send their children back to school immediately. Relevant factors include the ages of the employees’ children and the local authority policy.
Schools closed on 23 March, except for key workers' children and vulnerable children. On May 24 the Prime Minister confirmed previous indications that school re-opening will proceed gradually as follows:
- pupils in Reception, Year 1 and Year 6 return on 1 June
- a quarter of secondary Year 10 and 12 students will receive some contact time with teachers between 15 June and the start of the summer holidays.
The face to face time for year 10 and year 12 pupils is because they are due to take key exams next year and to supplement remote education, which should remain the predominant mode of education during the summer term for these year groups. The quarter of year 10 and year 12 pupils permitted to be in school includes vulnerable children and critical workers’ children in those year groups who are still encouraged to attend full-time, but is in addition to vulnerable pupils and children of critical workers from other year groups in full-time attendance.
School plans by region
The government has acknowledged that it may not be possible for all schools to re-open on 1 and 15 June. Teaching unions, backed by the British Medical Association, have expressed concerns about school safety and some local authorities in England have said their schools will remain closed until September. For example, Brighton and Hove, and regions in the North West including Cheshire East, Cheshire West, Chester and Stockport, have indicated they would not be advising schools to reopen yet. England’s schools are thought to be more likely to have fully reopened by September unless the government indicates otherwise.
For employers who wish to try and address employees’ concerns about schools, there is extensive government guidance for both schools and parents including provision for classes of no more than 15 children with one teacher with staggered breaks, lunches, arrival and departure times. Primary school heads are still planning for the last month of term while only allowing 15 children per classroom. There is also guidance on ventilation, water systems, increased cleaning and reduced use of shared items and discouraging taking home things like books.
For the rules in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, see Are the lockdown rules different in Scotland, Ireland and Wales? in our Managing remote working and business closures FAQs.
Q: Some of my employees have children returning to school and others do not. How do I manage this consistently?
Tension may arise in the workplace if some employees decide to send children back to school and others decide to keep the children off and refuse to return to work as a result.
Employers must behave fairly. Some employees may help by volunteering to return and employers should keep a record to show that they have done so. Problems will arise of there are perceived inequalities of treatment. The rules are different depending on the ages of the employees’ children and the local authority and region of the UK where the school is based. Ultimately employers may need to manage a situation where some employees continue to work from home and others return to the workplace. Employers have to balance continued working from home against trying to create a safer working environment for employees. The balance is different for every business and the risk can differ from week to week and in geographical locations.
Employers may have to decide which employees are needed to return to the workplace, taking into account factors such as:
- availability of transport for employees
- clinically extremely vulnerable workers who are shielding
- caring responsibilities and ages of children
- those with a disability and the duty to make reasonable adjustments.
Are staff all needed in the workplace?
Employers should assess risks and carry out a careful analysis of their staffing requirements deciding how many are physically needed in the workplace. Government advice still encourages those who can work from home to continue to do so. The Government says that sectors of the economy that are allowed to be open should be open. These sectors include food production, construction, manufacturing, logistics, distribution and scientific research in laboratories. The only exceptions to this are those workplaces such as hospitality, although the guidance is that non-essential retail outlets can open from June 15. Those who cannot work from home are actively encouraged to return to work in England if their workplace is open. Different advice applies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland where more people are currently advised to continue to stay at home.
As part of staff planning, employers should continually consult government websites for updated advice to ensure they understand what’s happening regarding workplace and school re-openings.
For further information on recommendations for different types of vulnerable people, see our question How do we decide who comes back and when (taking into account people who have had coronavirus already, those who need shielding, personal preference etc)? or government advice on COVID-19: guidance on shielding and protecting people defined on medical grounds as extremely vulnerable.
Q: Where does liability sit if employees catch coronavirus at work or on the way to work?
On Monday 11 May government advice said those who could not work from home should be ‘actively encouraged’ to return to work in England. Different advice applies in Scotland, Wales and NI. As soon as practicable, workplaces should follow the new government ‘Covid-19 Secure’ guidelines, which cover 8 types of work, including construction and other outdoor work, factories, plants and warehouses and offices and contact centres.
Employers have existing contractual and statutory duties to take care of employees’ health and safety. If employees can prove they caught coronavirus at work and the employer cannot show they have taken appropriate steps to prevent this, the employer could be liable for the employee’s losses. Some employees may be unable to work for some-time and some may have more serious health implications. Depending on the levels of Covid-19 in the UK population, and the accuracy of the government’s tracking app it will be difficult for employees to prove they contracted the disease at work. Although it should be rare, some employees may be able to establish the employer unnecessarily exposed them to danger and risk. Potential liabilities include health and safety protections, unfair dismissal and discrimination claims.
In the medical research, health and care sectors workers who subsequently develop coronavirus may have reasonable evidence that the exposure arose from the workplace. In other contexts, it will be harder to prove. However, there are many potential liabilities for failure to take care of staff, particularly if they are especially vulnerable. It is better for employers to be able to show that appropriate protections and adjustments were taken. For further details of employers’ duties see the FAQ on health and safety following return to work.
Employers should keep records to show that they have conducted appropriate health and safety risk assessments to identify and manage risks appropriately and that they have:
- Undertaken workplace safety audits.
- Updated policies and procedures.
- Identified potentially hazardous situations.
- Made changes to reduce exposure.
- Trained employees and communicated new policies and procedures to them.
- Monitored the workplace to ensure compliance by employees with new health and safety rules, policies, practices and procedures.
- Performed random checks and kept ongoing compliance reports in regular ongoing efforts to ensure compliance.
- Encouraged reporting of problems and have an open environment that welcomes feedback.
Some relevant legal aspects are set out below, and some practical steps are summarised in the FAQ on social distancing in the workplace.
Other duties at work
As well as the overriding duty to care for employees’ health and safety the following duties apply:
Risk assessment: Employers who have employees returning to their usual workplaces will need to ensure that they have conducted appropriate health and safety risk assessments to identify and manage risks appropriately. All employers in England should follow Government and Public Health England advice guidance to manage the workplace environment, for example by implementing social distancing measures wherever possible. Government advice on how to manage workplace risk and make your businesses ‘Covid-19 secure’ is available on the Government website.
Reporting: The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has issued guidance on reporting cases of Covid-19 under the 2013 Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations (RIDDOR). Reports will only be needed if:
- A worker has been diagnosed as having coronavirus and there is reasonable evidence it was caused by work exposure. This must be reported as a case of disease.
- An unintended incident at work has led to someone's possible or actual exposure to coronavirus, this must be reported as a dangerous occurrence.
Such incidents are more likely to occur in a laboratory, health or care setting. HSE guidance does not suggest that every case of Covid-19 in the workplace is reported and it is unlikely that extensive RIDDOR notifications will be made. Employers must consider the individual circumstances when they decide whether to report.
If employers do not take appropriate steps to comply with the relevant law and guidance such as social distancing at work or ensuring workers in 'shielded' category follow NHS advice to self-isolate, the HSE could simply provide advice or issue enforcement notices. The HSE will be conducting spot inspections and responding to reports from concerned individuals. In Scotland and Wales the police can enforce social distancing in the workplace.
Travelling to work
The current government advice in England (but not Wales, Scotland or NI) is to ‘actively encourage’ a return to work while trying to avoid public transport and maintaining social distancing. It will be difficult for employees to prove that they contracted the disease travelling into work and that the employer should be liable. However, employers may be liable if employees can show that they were unnecessarily exposed to risk when there were alternatives available.
For those returning, the Prime Minister advised they should avoid crowded public transport and either go by car, or even better by walking or bicycle. The transport secretary has announced new powers for councils to widen pavements and create new cycle lanes to facilitate socially distanced travel. As this is government advice, employers should encourage employees to avoid public transport and may consider, where possible:
- Provision of parking spaces.
- Secure bicycle parking.
- Shower facilities.
- Flexible or staggered working hours by agreement to enable employees to avoid more crowded public transport.
- Special provisions for vulnerable staff e.g. elderly, pregnant, and those with impaired immunity helping them to avoid public transport or its use at peak times.
You can find more information on staggered working hours in our flexible working guide.
Q: Social distancing is going to be very difficult in our workplace, what should we do?
Employers need to put people first and safeguard their health and well-being; homeworking should continue for every role that can be carried out remotely. If social distancing can’t be done properly or safely, employers should act responsibly in line with their legal obligations to ensure the health and safety of both their employees and any visitors to their site. This could mean staying closed. Employers should consider who really needs physically to be in the workplace. It may be possible to reorganise any non-essential workplace based work, as people’s health and safety is paramount. Employers should listen to people’s concerns about returning to work and allow for a period of adjustment and putting plans in place. For many businesses, easing lockdown restrictions will be a more challenging, complex and drawn-out process than the original lockdown.
Employers with health and safety and occupational health and facilities management teams should work closely with them and refer to the government website for the latest advice, including the Covid-19 secure workplace guidelines. They should also communicate and consult with employees about the measures to be introduced, including with any recognised trade unions and/or employee representatives.
As social distancing is likely to continue to apply for some time, to ensure that staff numbers allow for this employers can consider:
- shift working in teams
- office redesign
- home working
- other atypical working patterns.
These methods will reduce the number of people in the workplace. Changes to contractually agreed working hours will usually need employees’ agreement.
Everyone should follow the new government ‘Covid-19 Secure’ guidelines. As well as attempting adjustments to help maintain social distancing, guidance on hygiene is essential as evidence suggests that the virus can exist for up to 72 hours on surfaces. The preliminary government advice has suggested:
- Rigorous social distancing on public transport and avoidance of public transport at peak travel times.
- Wearing face coverings in enclosed spaces where social distancing isn’t possible and “where you will come into contact with people you do not normally meet”. This applies to short periods indoors in crowded areas, for example on public transport or shops. Medical standard PPE including masks should continue to be reserved for health and care workers.
- Frequent cleaning, especially communal surfaces like door handles or lift buttons and communal areas like bathrooms, kitchens and tea points.
- Ventilation of indoor spaces, as evidence suggests the virus is less likely to be passed on in well-ventilated buildings and outdoors. As well as leaving windows open, external extractor fans can maximise the flow of fresh air.
- Washing clothes regularly. Changing clothes in workplaces should be considered where there is a high infection risk or highly vulnerable people, such as in a care home.
- Avoiding crowds where possible, and allowing the use of more entrances and exits to buildings and staggering entry and exit points.
- Reduction of the number of people in a work setting by changing shift patterns and rotas. Employees can be matched with the same team each time as well as splitting people into smaller teams. You can refer to our flexible working measures guide for more information on staggered shifts.
Other practical steps
Safe work practices to limit exposure to Covid-19 at work include both overall control measures and minimising workers exposure to each other. Flexible leave and remote working should still be encouraged wherever possible to limit presence at the workplace. The following are just some examples of control measures depending on the nature of the role and workplace.
- Ensure staff who can work from home continue to do so.
- Anyone with symptoms (or who lives with someone with symptoms) should stay at home.
- Coordinate return to work procedures with any other businesses who share the building.
- Consider delivering some services remotely so that that only workers who are essential to the job are present at the workplace.
- Adjust working hours (by agreement) or stagger start and end times. There could be two staff groups with half working from home one week and half in the office the next.
- Reduce large unnecessary meetings and minimise the presence of third parties such as clients or customers.
- Encourage online or telephone orders, contactless delivery and physical distancing both inside and outside the premises.
- Stagger lunch and tea breaks to reduce the number of people sharing communal staff rooms.
- Limit numbers entering toilet facilities so that only one person at a time enters.
- Vulnerable workers should still work from home including older people, pregnant women, those with chronic conditions (including lung or heart problems, diabetes, cancer treatment or the immunosuppressed). Workers with close family members who are at high risk may also need special arrangements.
- Reduce physical contact between workers and distance or isolate workers whenever possible.
- Reassess the layout of work stations to ensure 2 metre distances.
- Reassess how many workers can be accommodated and use spare offices and meeting rooms to spread staff out.
- Consider barriers and empty desks between workers in the workplace as well as two- metre distances between staff. Plastic sheeting, partitions, and solid storage units may be appropriate.
- End hot desking.
- Encourage pick-up or delivery of goods outside the premises leaving goods to quarantine for a period where possible.
Safety equipment and facilities
- Provide anti-bacterial gel, PPE, masks, sanitation gel and wipes for all staff where possible and in appropriate sectors, in line with the latest Government advice. Train workers in correct use of PPE, facemasks and gloves if appropriate.
- Consider separating facilities such as toilets, cafeterias etc for staff and visitors.
Training and communication
- Communicate and consult with employees and line managers on plans to reopen and about any new rules and policies that apply. Refer to the Government guidelines where appropriate.
- Involve and consult with recognised trade unions and/or employee representatives where appropriate, especially where changes to working hours and other terms and conditions are needed.
- Send email reminders and display signs around the workplace to raise awareness of measures adopted.
- Increase the regularity of deep cleaning especially desks, surfaces, door handles, tools and other surfaces that people touch regularly. Leave doors open (subject to fire risks).
- Advise workers to wash their hands frequently and effectively and restock facilities regularly.
- Ensure waste bins lined with a plastic bags so that they can be emptied without touching the contents.
Employer should keep checking the government website for the latest guidance and remember that the physical, emotional and mental well-being of the workforce must remain the key principle behind any plans to return to the workplace.
Q: How do we decide who comes back and when (taking into account people who have had coronavirus already, those who need shielding, personal preference etc)?
Following the Government advice on Monday 11 May those who can work from home should continue to do so. Those who cannot work from home are being actively encouraged to return to work in England if their workplace is open. The Government say that sectors of the economy that are allowed to be open should be open. These sectors include food production, construction, manufacturing, logistics, distribution and scientific research in laboratories. The only exceptions to this are those workplaces such as hospitality and non- essential retail which the Government is currently requiring to remain closed. Different advice applies in Scotland, Wales and NI where people are all currently advised to continue to stay at home.
The Government has released 8 guides outlining how workplaces can operate safely during the pandemic and so many employers will now be looking to prepare for a return to the workplace. Part of this will be deciding which employees can safely return to the workplace.
If employers are selecting certain employees to return to the workplace (rather than requiring everyone to do so), employees must be selected fairly. Some employees may volunteer, and employers should keep a record to show that they have done so. You may wish to use the HR-inform return to the workplace conversation template. Decisions will also have to be based on factors such as availability of transport for individual workers to get to a physical workplace.
Employees who have fully recovered from coronavirus may seem an obvious choice to return to work but employers should not use this as a criterion. There is currently little evidence about the extent to which people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection. It is not known how long immunity (if any) will last and antibody testing is not easily available. In addition, some people who have had the virus will be left with long term health difficulties.
Clinically extremely vulnerable workers who are shielding and those with caring responsibilities should be prioritised to remain at home, taking account of the risk of age, sex and disability discrimination and, in particular, the duty to make reasonable adjustments for workers suffering from a qualifying disability.Employers need to consider how to balance the needs of individual employees with showing fairness and consistency across the workforce, to promote inclusion as much as possible.
For further information on the different recommendations for different types of vulnerable people see our FAQ on people returning to work that are shielding or the latest Government advice on shielding.
Employers who are making decisions about who comes back may wish to check they are protected by their employer’s liability, management liability or directors and officers (D&O) insurance.
Q: How do we go about staggering working hours to ensure not all staff are in at the same time?
To ensure staff are not all in at the same time there are many methods that can be adopted.
- The Government advice dated 11 May says that employers should consider staggering working hours thereby reducing demand on the public transport network, walking or cycle where possible and avoiding peak times on public transport. Employers may expand bicycle storage facilities, changing facilities and car parking to help.
- To reduce the risks of transmission in the workplace employers should limit the number of people that any given individual comes into contact with. Employers can support this where practical by changing shift patterns and rotas to keep smaller, contained teams.
- To implement the government advice, groups of employees on staggered shifts, with different hours, days, weeks and locations are all options. All forms of flexible working can be considered, including remote working. You can refer to our guide on flexible working measures for more information on staggered shifts.
- Employers need to consider the legal position of any revised working arrangements. Employees’ consent will normally be required and there should be a communication process, information and consultation about the changes. Flexibility is key and if employees understand that their safety and well-being is at the core of any changes this should help achieve consent. The best approach to change is by agreement with employees; fully explaining the situation and likely period of the changes, discussing any concerns raised.
- Any contractual changes should be implemented very carefully bearing in mind contractual provisions and different legal rights (for example, working hours, rest breaks).
- Those attending for some hours in the workplace must observe social distancing, high standards of hygiene and the other steps suggested in the FAQ about social distancing. Employers can refer to the government guidance.
- Employers who had to stay open during lockdown may be able to offer guidance to other employers who are now considering some employees returning to work on site. Visit the CIPD community to share ideas and experiences.
Q: What do I do about people returning to work that are shielding or living with people who may be shielding?
Identifying those who are shielding is slightly complicated as government advice has changed. Those who received the letter confirming they are in the shielding group, can reasonably refuse to attend the place of work whilst the risk of infection is significant.
The government advice of 11 May attaches an Annex B which summarises vulnerable groups. In summary there are the following categories of people:
- Clinically extremely vulnerable: People with a great risk of severe illness eg those who have had transplants, on chemotherapy or with renal failure. This group are shielding and must stay at home at all times until at least the end of June.
- Clinically vulnerable: People over 70, those with liver disease or diabetes. Pregnant women. This group are not shielding but should stay at home as much as possible and minimise contact with others outside household.
- Vulnerable: Children at risk of abuse or with SEN, women at risk of domestic violence. This group follow general guidance unless also clinically or extremely vulnerable.
People who are shielding have extra protections:
- Many will be disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 and insisting they come back to work may be unlawful as it could be classed as discrimination arising from disability or failure to make reasonable adjustments. To be protected disabled people must have a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and adverse effect on ability to carry out day to day activities. Certain health conditions, such as cancer and multiple sclerosis are automatically treated as disabilities. There may also be age discrimination issues.
- Those people who are shielding are also be protected from detriment or dismissal for a health and safety reason under the Employment Rights Act. If an employer insists on a return to the workplace this may be a constructive unfair dismissal which could be automatically with no minimum qualifying period of employment being required to bring the claim.
All employees (not just those who are shielding) who reasonably believe themselves to be in serious and imminent danger are entitled to take appropriate steps to protect themselves.
If there are aspects of work that can be done from home, this is likely to be a reasonable adjustment which must be considered for those who qualify under the Equality Act disability provisions. Requests to continue home working are likely to fall within the requests for flexible working legislation.
Living with people who may be shielding
The protections referred to above are also likely to protect employees who live with people who are shielding. The Equality Act 2010 protects people from discrimination as a result of their association with a disabled person. Employers who give a blanket refusal to consider continued working from home would disproportionately impact people who are associated with disabled people. It is also likely that they have protection from detriment or dismissal as there are genuine health and safety reasons for needing to stay away from the workplace. As ever, each case needs to be looked at on its own facts.
Employees are also entitled to reasonable time off to provide assistance for dependents who are ill. If the person shielding is a child parental leave of up to 18 weeks may also apply.
Shielding employees with underlying health conditions employers can seek the support of occupational health or other professionals for risk assessments, and advice on returning to work or on reasonable adjustments.
The risk for shielding employees are not simply those in the workplace, but also the exposure in their commute to work and back. Employers should be flexible and understanding and keep the health and safety of their employees as their priority.
Q: What if our people can't come back - or don't want to travel on public transport?
The current government advice in England (but not Wales, Scotland or NI) is to ‘actively encourage’ a return to work for those who cannot work from home, while trying to avoid public transport and maintaining social distancing. Employees are advised to avoid crowded public transport and either go by car, or by walking or bicycle. Other points include:
- The Government will provide new statutory guidance to encourage local authorities to widen pavements, create pop-up cycle lanes, and close some roads in cities to traffic (apart from buses).
- Social distancing guidance on public transport must be followed rigorously and transport operators should follow appropriate the guidance to make their services Covid- 19 Secure.
Face coverings are now advised in enclosed spaces where social distancing isn’t possible and where people encounter others they do not normally meet. This is applies to short periods indoors in crowded areas including public transport and shops.
Employees may understandably show confusion at the speed at which the guidance has changed which may increase their anxieties.
It is sensible if all unnecessary work-related travel is minimised; availability of safe public transport should be taken into account in any decisions to return to the workplace. Employers can stagger rotas and start and finish times to promote physical distancing, provide extra parking and extra bike storage. As well as this, continuing home working is preferable provided that some or all of an employee’s work can be performed remotely. Work duties can be altered by agreement to accommodate those who are anxious to avoid crowded public transport to get to work.
From a legal standpoint, on the one hand, under the Employment Rights Act 1996 employees can claim that they have suffered a detriment on health and safety grounds, or claim automatically unfair dismissal if the employee reasonably believes there was a serious and imminent danger which led to their refusal to return to work. On the other, in all employment contracts there is an implied term that employees must follow their employer’s lawful and reasonable instructions. Employees could therefore face disciplinary action if their continued refusal to attend work is unreasonable. However, avoiding public transport seems reasonable, especially when the government has advised against it. There is at least a risk that disciplining employees for refusal to travel may result in a health and safety detriment, unfair dismissal or discrimination claim.
The employer should listen to the employee’s concerns, especially if they are vulnerable or have a disability and consider their proposals and accommodate them as far as practicable. Employers should also remember that employees with some mental health issues may be anxious about travelling and if their mental condition constitutes a disability the employer should try and accommodate their request.
Employers can discuss other options such as unpaid leave or use of of annual leave to achieve a phased return.
Q: What is the legal and moral position on encouraging vs mandating return?
The legal and moral position for employers on encouraging employees to return is a difficult decision to make. Whilst the government in England is 'actively encouraging' those who cannot work from home to return to work there is no legal obligation to do so. Different advice applies in Scotland, Wales and NI whose workers are encouraged to stay at home.
Employers have to undertake a balancing act taking into account:
- managing the health risks employees face in the workplace and travelling to work from potential exposure to the virus
- financial pressures of their business
- the fact that the furlough scheme may shortly have reduced payments before coming to an end
- the safety risks that new working practices may present to employees and others whilst the threat of infection from Covid-19 remains
- problems faced by those needing childcare*.
The CIPD is urging businesses to ensure they can meet three key tests before bringing their people back to the workplace:
Is it essential? If people can continue to work from home they must continue to do that for the foreseeable future. If they cannot work from home, is their work deemed essential or could the business continue to use the Government’s Job Retention Scheme for longer, giving them the time needed to put safety measures and clear employee guidance and consultation in place?
Is it sufficiently safe? Employers have a duty of care to identify and manage risks to ensure that the workplace is sufficiently safe to return to. Employers should take their time with gradual returns to work to test health and safety measures in practice and ensure they can work with larger numbers before encouraging more of their workforce back.
Is it mutually agreed? It’s vital that there is a clear dialogue between employers and their people so concerns, such as commuting by public transport, can be raised and individuals needs and worries taken into account. There will need to be flexibility on both sides to accommodate different working times or schedules as ways of managing some of these issues.
*Following the government press conference on 11 May it appears that children of parents working in for example manufacturing or construction cannot attend school with key workers’ children. This means many employees will therefore have childcare issues before the schools start their gradual reopening.
Q: I need to make redundancies when the teams get back, how do I go about doing this as some that have stayed on may be selected?
If employers need to make redundancies when the teams get back (as a result of an actual or anticipated decline in workload) normal redundancy selection and consultation procedures apply. Advance planning and communication are essential explaining to all staff the reasons and selection criteria etc.
Employers should fully explore alternatives and choose their redundancy selection pool carefully; this can include staff who have been furloughed, those working from home and those in the workplace. Just because staff were furloughed does not mean they should be selected in preference to others.
Employers should inform and consult and carry out a fair redundancy process. Depending on how long they have been employed employees with one or two complete continuous years of service may have claims for unfair dismissal if their employment is terminated without fair procedure.
If 20 or more employees will be redundant within a 90-day period, there should also be collective consultation, in addition to consultation with each individual employee. There must be at least 30 days' consultation for 20-99 redundancies or if there are 100 or more redundancies, there must be a minimum of 45 days' consultation in Great Britain (90 days in Northern Ireland). If there are no existing trade union or employee representatives in place employers will need to ensure appropriate employee representatives are elected before this. There must also be notification to BEIS before giving notice to terminate any of the relevant employees' contracts (similar time limits apply).
You can refer to our redundancy during COVID-19 guide for more information.
Q: How do we get across to those who want to return to work for their well-being and social interaction, that with social distancing, the return to the workplace could make them feel worse?
It’s really important that employers manage people’s expectations about what a return to a physical workplace will mean in practice. Meeting an employer’s obligation to provide a safe working environment will mean putting in place onerous but vital health and safety measures to manage the risks from COVID-19.
This means that the workplace will look and feel very different to many employees when they return. Many of the elements people enjoy as part of their working experience, such as opportunities for human interaction, will be greatly affected by the stringent 2-metre physical distancing measures in place. This will include screens separating workstations, as well as the closing off of communal areas such as canteens and break out areas if necessary.
Managers should be guided to have open and supportive one-to-one discussions with every individual as a first step of the return-to-work process. This conversation should be two-way: as well as communicating the changes that have been implemented to keep the workplace safe, it should provide an opportunity for individuals to air any worries they have about returning to a workplace. The aim should be to reassure employees of the organisation’s steps to ensure a safe return, and prepare them for the changes that will have taken place.
All staff should also be made aware of their own responsibilities to ensure a safe working environment for themselves and their colleagues and customers.
Q: How do we assess people before they return in terms of well-being/mental state?
The risks to people’s health from this pandemic are psychological as well as physical. Everyone will have experienced a challenging time during lockdown and many will have experienced anxiety due to a range of different factors, depending on their individual circumstances. People’s mental health is fluctuating, so there needs to be an ongoing conversation about well-being as part of every manager-employee one-to-one.
Individuals who have a pre-existing mental health condition, such as anxiety and depression, should have been offered support during this health crisis. But many others will now have developed a mental health condition, and so support such as an employee assistance programme or counseling should be offered to all employees.
The best way to assess people’s mental well-being before a return to a physical workplace is to encourage a culture where people feel safe to talk about their feelings and seek help. Hopefully, managers will have the kind of trust-based relationship with each team member whereby an employee can raise their concerns.
Managers need to listen with empathy and treat all concerns seriously, and signpost to help if needed. They also need to be prepared to discuss any changes to someone’s role or working arrangement to help ease them back to work. Many people will need a period of readjustment and so a phased or gradual return could be needed.
Managers could also be feeling vulnerable and so it’s very important that employers ensure they are properly supported to support employee well-being, and can address their own well-being concerns.
Q: How do we deal with the commuting risk and anxiety for many colleagues?
Government guidance is that if someone cannot work from home and has to travel to work, they should cycle or walk wherever possible. It advises employers to implement measures such as staggering arrival and departure times to reduce crowding, and by providing additional parking/bike racks.
However, many people rely on public transport to get to and from work, and may not have a car or bike. Public transport can become congested, particularly during peak rush hours, making it very difficult to maintain physical distancing from other commuters. The availability of public transport is also an issue, as trains, buses and tubes have been running a much-reduced service. Many employees are therefore likely to have legitimate concerns about using public transport, especially as government advice says to avoid it.
Any decisions about whether or not an individual employee should return to a workplace needs to factor in wider considerations such as their daily commute and ability to arrive safely. Every employee should have the opportunity to discuss any concerns about their commute with their manager as part of the return-to-work process, which should take place in advance of the day that individual is expected to return.
DISCLAIMER: The materials provided here are for general information purposes and do not constitute legal or other professional advice. While the information is considered to be true and correct at the date of publication, changes in circumstances may impact the accuracy and validity of the information. The CIPD is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any action or decision taken as a result of using the guidance. You should consult the government website for the very latest information or contact a professional adviser for legal or other advice where appropriate.
If you have other queries about COVID-19 not covered above, please contact the CIPD member employment law helpline on 03330 431 217 or visit the Community pages
We know that our members and customers are facing challenging times and we are here to help you. Due to a high number of calls we apologise that your wait time may be longer than usual. We appreciate your patience and will connect you to an expert adviser as soon as we can.
Explore our related content
CIPD experts, leaders and practitioners tackle the key issues and questions around the pandemic
Download a range of practice materials to assist in supporting their business and workforce through a global health emergency